This development application appears after reading it to be a fabrication of lies calling it a community centre. The contents within the proposal suggest the facility for mosque purposes and therefore should have been stated as such resulting in the proposal being perceived as misleading to the community. Should the Quran be preached within this facility, it will preach it's contents which are not compatible with western society and constitutional law. This application is perception deception. In other terms, taqiyya. They should integrate within our community including all of the wonderful facilities we already have in the region and not segregate themselves. I have seen countless advertisements displaying this property as a mosque, and countless suggestions in the proposal as such, so there is a big difference between a community centre and a mosque. Not a good start for the proposal is it?
All recent comments on applications from Tamworth Regional Council, NSW
I agree with all the above comments
I don't know if this comes within the City of Sydney, but they don't consider the amount of Parking at all, and they are just squeezing more and more businesses and people in everywhere with no thought to the residents.
I would have to agree with a previous objection, if the so called community centre, is going to be used as a religious worshiping centre, the application should be appropriately submitted as such so that it can be assessed appropriately. If the applicant continues to advise that the centre will not be used as a religious worship centre and there are already concerns being raised that it will be, a caveat should be placed on any approval that the centre not be used for any religious worship. Let the application be judged correctly in regards to what it is intended to be used as, not being clouded to its true intentions.
Tamworth does not need a mosque/prayer centre or another community centre. Why segregate them from other people. Plain and simple. Not needed.
Further to my first submission, Council needs to ask Telstra why they are putting a development application here at 3 Jean Street when they already have a DA approved for another mobile phone tower, within 2 kilometres, that I believe has been approved, that would be in the middle of a rail road corridor, with no houses immediately "just over the fence" and probably solving the problem Telstra are trying to overcome. This tower DA application is at Duri Rd, across from the South Tamworth Vets. On making enquiries to Telstra locally (North West Region) about what was happening to this Duri Rd development, the Telstra officials could not find anything about it in their files and I had to send them their Telstra development notice, they sent out to nearby residents in April 2013 !!!! Could it be locally the Telstra Nth West were not aware of this other approved mobile phone tower DA? I think so because why would you make a DA for a tower upgrade in a heavily populated area, when you already have an approved DA, for the same thing, 2 kilometres away? Doesn't make sense to me and Council need to ask Telstra why they are not going to use the less invasive Duri Rd site.
Jeff Bartlett
Your comment: We in South Tamworth from the top of hill in Roberts St, towards Duri Rd, around Jill, John and Nancy St's have a black spot with Telstra. You can always tell when Telstra residents in Nancy St have a mobile phone call, they are standing in their yard with a mobile phone to the ear. And we are how far from the Tamworth Post Office???? The proposed Telstra mobile tower on Duri Rd, near Sth Tamworth vets, is not going to occur, according to information received by me from Telstra (available if required with a very embarrassing story about Telstra to go with it !!! ). If Telstra has decided not to go ahead with the Duri Rd development, the proposed development in Jean St is our life boat!!! This development will help to alleviate this black spot in South Tamworth and benefit South Tamworth residents.