108 Francis Street, Bondi Beach NSW 2026

Description
Alterations and additions to dual occupancy including internal reconfiguration, excavation and construction of two new garages, and driveways, removal of one street tree, new terrace above the garage, and associated landscaping. PAN-505259
Planning Authority
Waverley Council
View source
Reference number
DA-19/2025
Date sourced
We found this application on the planning authority's website on , 9 months ago. It was received by them earlier.
Notified
1199 people were notified of this application via Planning Alerts email alerts
Comments
3 comments made here on Planning Alerts

Save this search as an email alert?

Create an account or sign in.

It only takes a moment.

Public comments on this application

3

Comments made here were sent to Waverley Council. Add your own comment.

This is a definite NO to a removal of a street tree (not on private property) for the convenience and profit of private property.

This street tree provides important bird and insect habitat, and this is absolutely crucial when so many trees are being removed from private property, often for entirely spurious reasons.

The tree also provides shade and local amenity for residents and people nearby. People choose this street over others to walk to the beach and shops in the heart of Bondi precisely because it has shade and feels good. This amenity increases the value of ALL properties in the street.

Ana Sofia Strophe
Delivered to Waverley Council

Agree that the street tree must not be removed so the developer can construct a garage. It is a mature tree decades old and therefore not replaceable

Barracluff resident
Delivered to Waverley Council

There are precedents of trees in Bondi Junction (and likely elsewhere but I'm only aware of some in Bondi J) in rear lanes - or roads that give access to the rears of properties - that cannot be removed to facilitate vehicle curb-crossing into proposed garages.
If Waverley Council is serious about this:
https://cityhub.com.au/local-council-in-sydney-will-be-covered-in-tree-canopy-and-vegetation-cover
passed about a year ago when they all held hands and joined the living, they will rejected this developer's application outright. That tree has taken decades to grow, providing all of the vital elements listed by those comments above.
It is the perfect example of Council's 35% tree canopy by 2032 promise.
It can never be replaced, at least in our generation and the one or two to follow.
It must be protected.
The application to kill it should be rejected.

Margaret Avian
Delivered to Waverley Council

Add your own comment