Comments made here were sent to Randwick City Council. Add your own comment.
Removal of 7+ mature or semi-mature trees seems excessive for the installation of a swimming pool. The arborist's report implies they are of low value, or 'infested' - surely the infestation can be treated rather than being used as a justification to remove them? This is a lot of tree cover being removed for a luxury item, so near to the beach. I would propose re-designing the pool to minimise tree destruction.
I fully agree with the previous comment.
To remove seven trees is ridiculous. As their arborist said “they are infested “, so why can’t they be treated? Maybe a second arborist’s opinion should be sought. Repositioning of the pool area around the trees would be more sympathetic.
Dear Randwick Council,
I think it's crucial that the planning department reviews and measures this application in tune with the council's wider initiatives for increasing canopy cover across the Randwick area (fantastic work). At a time when it is harder to get plants established due to extreme weather patterns, keeping more trees in the ground and building on what we have should be the priority here. As the previous comments have also raised, an infestation can in most cases be treated.
A good designer would be able to work around this when it comes to planning the pool. And having shade after a swim is always great in the summer too!
Thank you.
