Why is it tham invariably when developments are approved (and started) that they are allowed to add additional height & floors? 😭
11 - 13 The Seven Ways, Rockdale NSW 2216
- Description
- Modifications to DA-2020/35 including the addition of an additional storey with seven (7) Co Living Rooms
- Planning Authority
-
Bayside Council
- Reference number
-
MDA-2022/173
-
Date sourced
- We found this application on the planning authority's website on , over 2 years ago. It was received by them earlier.
-
Notified
- 444 people were notified of this application via Planning Alerts email alerts
-
Comments
- 2 comments made here on Planning Alerts
Public comments on this application
2
Comments made here were sent to Bayside Council. Add your own comment.
”
Kevin Coleman
Delivered to
Bayside Council
”
This planning disease is known as development creep. Rather than being treated and eliminated by planning authorities, it is in fact encouraged by loose and favourably worded planning instruments, invariably interpreted in favour of proponents.
These applications consistently misuse the system when, in fact, they should be forced to start again. They represent gross changes that should not be covered by the amendment provisions. How can an additional floor be regarded as a modification? I guess that’s “another story”!
A fresh application is required. Alas, the system fails again.
Harry Volting
Delivered to
Bayside Council
”