The proposed use is not consistent with the zoning of the land and surrounding homes.
The proposed use responds negatively to the surrounding context.
The proposed use fails to respond to best practice solutions for smoke alarms, fire alarms and suppression systems given the intensity of use proposed.
The proposed use fails to respond to the amenity of surrounding residents regarding proper off-street parking provision.
In terms of light, noise, odours, motor and pedestrian traffic the proposed use fails to respond positively to the amenity of neighbouring residents.
The proposed use represents an inappropriate planning outcome.
The proposed use reduces the supply of long-term housing for the community.
The scale of structures combined with nature and intensity of use proposed represents an inappropriate planning outcome.
The scale of structures combined with nature and intensity of use proposed fails to respond positively to the surrounding context.
It is sought by this objector that the outcome of determining this application be a determination of refusal.
